ASUS MK241 24" 2ms Monitor

[Bushwacker]

Real nice flat panel for just about anything you throw at it at least for peeps that aren't doing professional video or photos. Great for us gamers though. To bad it's not adjustable, thats kind of a big deal, for me it would be anyway.

http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/util_get_image/21/0,1425,i=212304,00.jpg
Check out the review HERE (http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2319729,00.asp)

[Almuric]

24" is nice, but I think I'm going to get a 22". My viewing requirements for a wide-screen is that it must support at least 1024 pixels tall so that I can see pages made for 1280x1024. 22" fits the bill and saves me a little $$$ as they're the sweet spot for widescreens right now.

[Bushwacker]

What are you doing Trog?

[Almuric]

what do you mean?

[Bushwacker]

My viewing requirements for a wide-screen is that it must support at least 1024 pixels tall so that I can see pages made for 1280x1024. 22" fits the bill.

Just wondering what your doing that you need to run at this Res is all.:)

[Almuric]

I work with pictures some and also remote desktop into other PCs. I need the 1024 height to keep from having to scroll.

[Bushwacker]

ah gotcha... So really your just looking to save some money then, because you know the native res on the 24 is 1920x1200 right? I do the same thing at work and home. I usually have two RDP's open email and a few other programs running at work and I'm using a Dell 24WFP. Works great for me. Your right about the price though. The 22's are very affordable.

[Almuric]

Yeah, Im not going to run high definition movies on my computer so I have no need for 1920x1200. If prices come down enough I may buy a 24" when I'm building my next PC. Plans are for Feb-ish timeframe.

[Silentblade]

I have a 19" WS and love it. Wish it would have been a bit bigger though as 1400 x 900 the 900 just isn't tall enough.